Thought Experiment: On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the most, how much do you enjoy strategic thinking? How much time per day, week, month, or year do you and the organization spend actively thinking about & discussing strategy (rather than operational or tactical issues)? How prepared is the organization to respond to emerging risks, threats, and entirely new competitive environments?
Every effective organization, from startups to established conglomerates, typically undergoes some form of annual strategy review. However, the question remains: if you're satisfied with your current strategy, how do you ensure that it’s still the right one? And even more crucially, how do you future-proof it to withstand challenges and capitalize on emerging opportunities?
The answer is to make your strategy bulletproof—or, as we like to say, to battle-test it. This is particularly vital if you’re not in the process of crafting a completely new strategy but instead looking to assess and reinforce an existing one. Given the considerable time and cost invested when senior leaders come together to deliberate over strategy, it’s essential to make the most out of those sessions. You don’t want to just tweak your strategy; you want to ensure it stands strong, ready to thrive, no matter what the future holds.
There are a variety of exercises that organizations can use to assess and strengthen their strategy. While each one offers value independently, a combination of these exercises creates a comprehensive toolkit for future-proofing your approach. Let's explore some of these exercises in greater detail, with examples and clarifications of the expected outcomes:
Backcasting is an exercise where participants work backward from a desired future outcome to determine the steps that would need to be taken to achieve it. The key benefit here is that you start with a clear and defined winning aspiration and then identify all the intermediate goals and actions required to bring that vision to life. This process not only ensures that your strategy is aligned with a tangible end but also provides an opportunity to evaluate whether anything in your current strategy needs to be adjusted.
By thinking backward, you can uncover potential gaps or opportunities to improve, tweak, or eliminate certain elements. Backcasting can be a great way to stress-test your strategy and validate its direction.
Example: Imagine you're the leadership team at a global tech company with a goal of becoming carbon-neutral by 2030. Using backcasting, you would work backward from this future (carbon neutrality in 2030) to determine the steps and actions required to reach that point. You might identify the need to invest in renewable energy technologies, rework your supply chain for sustainability, and set specific emission-reduction targets.
Outcome: The final result of backcasting is a clear roadmap of actions and milestones that need to be achieved to reach the desired future. By aligning this roadmap with your current strategy, you can identify areas that need adjustment—whether that's adding new initiatives or reevaluating current goals. In our example, the roadmap might highlight gaps in your emissions targets or missing investment in green technology, prompting action to adjust the current strategy.
A premortem is the inverse of backcasting—it assumes failure instead of success. The idea is to work backward from a scenario where your strategy has failed and identify the potential reasons why this might have happened. This allows you to preemptively address weaknesses in your current plan by identifying areas that could cause your strategy to falter.
This exercise is helpful because it challenges assumptions and reveals potential vulnerabilities that might not be immediately obvious. By addressing these issues early, you can significantly strengthen your strategy, ensuring that the goals and objectives you set are more achievable and resilient.
Example: Let’s say you're leading a company that’s about to launch a new product. In a premortem exercise, you ask the team to assume the product launch was a failure. What went wrong? You might discover overlooked risks, such as failure to anticipate customer demand or an underestimation of competitor response.
Outcome: The result of a premortem is a comprehensive list of potential failure points, providing the leadership team with concrete areas to address before proceeding with the product launch. The final product might be an updated strategy document that includes contingency plans for identified risks, ensuring that steps are taken to mitigate them before they become issues.
These exercises help to forecast future developments based on current trends and data.
Example:
Outcome: These exercises result in a set of insights that highlight likely future trends, possible disruptions, and emerging opportunities. The final outcome is a strategy that has been informed by a data-driven and forward-looking view of the business environment. This might take the form of a set of updated strategic initiatives, such as the incorporation of digital transformation or sustainability measures, helping the company remain competitive.
While forecasting and trend analysis focus on predicting the future, scenario planning helps you explore multiple possible futures without attempting to predict which one will come to pass. Scenario planning involves creating detailed stories about how different combinations of changes might unfold in the future. These stories—while not necessarily predictions—help identify vulnerabilities and strengths in your current strategy.
By testing your strategy against a variety of potential futures, you can better understand how resilient it is under different conditions. It also helps you decide in advance what actions might be necessary in response to particular scenarios, strengthening the flexibility and adaptability of your strategic approach. By doing this frequently, you can supercharge your strategic fitness.
Example: A pharmaceutical company might use scenario planning to prepare for the possibility of a major regulatory change that could impact the approval process for new drugs. They would create scenarios where the regulatory environment becomes more stringent, less stringent, or remains the same, then evaluate how the company's current strategy would hold up under each scenario.
Outcome: The output from scenario planning is a series of possible futures and corresponding strategic responses. These scenarios enable the company to prepare for different contingencies, allowing them to adjust their strategy in advance. The final result is a more adaptable and flexible strategy that can withstand different regulatory environments, with specific actions outlined for each possible future.
To truly test your strategy's strength, consider more dynamic and high-intensity exercises like war games and crisis simulations:
These exercises may require considerable upfront planning but yield some of the most significant insights, helping you identify weak spots, siloed thinking, and bottlenecks that could undermine your strategy’s success.
Example:
Outcome: The result of these exercises is a tested, robust strategy with actionable insights into how your company would respond to crises. War games and crisis simulations highlight gaps in current plans, encourage quicker decision-making, and foster better interdepartmental coordination. These exercises often result in an updated, more resilient crisis management plan and clear action steps that can be executed in the event of an actual crisis.
Finally, contingency planning is about preparing for the most likely or most impactful events that could disrupt your strategy. This exercise involves creating playbooks or action plans that outline specific responses to crises, allowing leaders to react swiftly and decisively.
By developing contingency plans, you ensure that your organization is ready to respond to threats and capitalize on opportunities quickly. Whether it's a market disruption, a regulatory change, or a competitive challenge, having a clear playbook ensures that your strategy remains agile and adaptable.
Example: A transportation company might identify a potential disruption, such as a spike in fuel prices or a strike in the workforce. In a contingency planning exercise, the leadership team creates a series of action plans that provide clear steps on how to respond to these risks, such as adjusting pricing or securing backup labor sources.
Outcome: The final outcome of contingency planning is a well-defined set of procedures and playbooks that guide leadership on what to do if specific high-impact events occur. These plans are often documented, ensuring that everyone knows their role and how to respond swiftly. By preparing in advance, the organization can minimize damage and maintain operational continuity, making the strategy more adaptable and responsive.
The future is inherently uncertain, but organizations that proactively invest time and energy into these exercises can transform uncertainty from a risk into an opportunity. By applying creative and strategic thinking to test and strengthen your current strategy, you ensure that your organization remains resilient in the face of change.
As the saying goes, "Success favors the prepared." Organizations that embrace this mindset and actively battle-test their strategy are better positioned to weather future storms and capitalize on emerging opportunities. In the end, strategic planning isn’t just about charting a course—it’s about being ready to adjust the sails when the wind shifts.
Thought Experiment: Which activity or two would most benefit your team or organization?
If you'd like support leading any of these exercises in your organization, we can help!
45 Baseball Place, Suite 1402
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4M 0H1
All Rights Reserved | Ingram Solutions